With Judgment No 15 of 9 February 2023, the Italian Constitutional Court upheld the legitimacy of the compulsory vaccination against COVID-19 imposed on specific categories of workers and of the consequences of non-compliance. This contribution analyses the reasoning of both the referring judges and the Constitutional Court, to understand whether the latter’s conclusion can be said to be persuasive. In this respect, it is first maintained that the Court was correct in justifying the limitation on the right not to be subject to unwanted health treatments since the right to health also entails the State’s obligation to protect public health. What appears to be questionable is the Court’s finding that the exclusion of suspended workers from the maintenance benefits or any form of social security is constitutionally legitimate. A more careful consideration of international human rights law might perhaps have led the Court to a different conclusion.

COVID-19 Compulsory Vaccination for Specific Categories of Workers and the Socio-Economic Consequences of Non-compliance before Italy’s Constitutional Court: A Public Health and Human Rights Analysis / Greco, Donato. - In: JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH LAW. - ISSN 2976-5951. - 1:1(2024), pp. 106-118. [10.4337/jghl.2024.01.06]

COVID-19 Compulsory Vaccination for Specific Categories of Workers and the Socio-Economic Consequences of Non-compliance before Italy’s Constitutional Court: A Public Health and Human Rights Analysis

donato greco
2024

Abstract

With Judgment No 15 of 9 February 2023, the Italian Constitutional Court upheld the legitimacy of the compulsory vaccination against COVID-19 imposed on specific categories of workers and of the consequences of non-compliance. This contribution analyses the reasoning of both the referring judges and the Constitutional Court, to understand whether the latter’s conclusion can be said to be persuasive. In this respect, it is first maintained that the Court was correct in justifying the limitation on the right not to be subject to unwanted health treatments since the right to health also entails the State’s obligation to protect public health. What appears to be questionable is the Court’s finding that the exclusion of suspended workers from the maintenance benefits or any form of social security is constitutionally legitimate. A more careful consideration of international human rights law might perhaps have led the Court to a different conclusion.
2024
Italian Constitutional Court; public health; compulsory vaccination; economic and social consequences of non-compliance; human rights; economic and social rights
COVID-19 Compulsory Vaccination for Specific Categories of Workers and the Socio-Economic Consequences of Non-compliance before Italy’s Constitutional Court: A Public Health and Human Rights Analysis / Greco, Donato. - In: JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH LAW. - ISSN 2976-5951. - 1:1(2024), pp. 106-118. [10.4337/jghl.2024.01.06]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
jghl-article-p106.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 131.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
131.92 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/240378
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact