The better toolbox: experimental methodology in economics and psychology

In experimental economics one can confront a “don’t!”, as in “do not deceive your participants!”, as well as a “do!”, as in “incentivize choice making!”. Neither exists in experimental psychology. Further controversies exist in data collection methods, e.g., play strategy (vector) method in game experiments, and how to guarantee external and internal validity by describing experimental scenarios by feld-related vignettes or by abstract, often formal, rules as it is used in decision and game theory. We emphasize that diferences between the experimental methodology of the two disciplines are minor rather than substantial and suggest that such diferences should be resolved, as much as possible, through empirical research. Rather than focusing on familiar debates, we suggest to substitute the revealed-motive approach in experimental economics by designs whose data not only inform about choice, but also about the reasoning dynamics.