Calibrating a classification system consists in transforming the output scores, which somehow state the confidence of the classifier regarding the predicted output, into proper probability estimates. Having a well-calibrated classifier has a non-negligible impact on many real-world applications, for example decision making systems synthesis for anomaly detection/fault prediction. In such industrial scenarios, risk assessment is certainly related to costs which must be covered. In this paper we review three state-of-the-art calibration techniques (Platt’s Scaling, Isotonic Regression and SplineCalib) and we propose three lightweight procedures based on a plain fitting of the reliability diagram. Computational results show that the three proposed techniques have comparable performances with respect to the three state-of-the-art approaches.
Martino, Alessio; De Santis, Enrico.; Baldini, Luca; Rizzi, Antonello. (2019). Calibration techniques for binary classification problems: A comparative analysis. In Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Computational Intelligence (pp. 487- 495). SciTePress. Isbn: 978-989758384-1. Doi: 10.5220/0008165504870495. https://www.scitepress.org/Link.aspx?doi=10.5220/0008165504870495.
Calibration techniques for binary classification problems: A comparative analysis
Martino, Alessio.
;
2019
Abstract
Calibrating a classification system consists in transforming the output scores, which somehow state the confidence of the classifier regarding the predicted output, into proper probability estimates. Having a well-calibrated classifier has a non-negligible impact on many real-world applications, for example decision making systems synthesis for anomaly detection/fault prediction. In such industrial scenarios, risk assessment is certainly related to costs which must be covered. In this paper we review three state-of-the-art calibration techniques (Platt’s Scaling, Isotonic Regression and SplineCalib) and we propose three lightweight procedures based on a plain fitting of the reliability diagram. Computational results show that the three proposed techniques have comparable performances with respect to the three state-of-the-art approaches.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Martino_Calibration-techniques_2019.pdf
Open Access
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
640.18 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
640.18 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
|
Martino_Calibration-techniques_Cover_2019.pdf
Open Access
Descrizione: cover
Tipologia:
Altro materiale allegato
Licenza:
DRM (Digital rights management) non definiti
Dimensione
3.21 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.21 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
|
Martino_Calibration-techniques_TOC_2019.pdf
Open Access
Descrizione: indice
Tipologia:
Altro materiale allegato
Licenza:
DRM (Digital rights management) non definiti
Dimensione
193.89 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
193.89 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



