Why the Commission was right in the Intel case. Wasn't it? A few comments on some aspects of the celebrated European Intel Case. While it is apparent that >Intel's Behaviorwas objectionable under many respects, other practices, though negatively evaluated by most commentators, might constitute typical examples of 'false positives'.

Perché la Commissione aveva ragione. Oppure no? / Pardolesi, Roberto. - In: MERCATO CONCORRENZA REGOLE. - ISSN 1590-5128. - XV:2(2013), pp. 357-361.

Perché la Commissione aveva ragione. Oppure no?

PARDOLESI, ROBERTO
2013

Abstract

Why the Commission was right in the Intel case. Wasn't it? A few comments on some aspects of the celebrated European Intel Case. While it is apparent that >Intel's Behaviorwas objectionable under many respects, other practices, though negatively evaluated by most commentators, might constitute typical examples of 'false positives'.
Exclusive dealing Rebates Naked exclusion
Perché la Commissione aveva ragione. Oppure no? / Pardolesi, Roberto. - In: MERCATO CONCORRENZA REGOLE. - ISSN 1590-5128. - XV:2(2013), pp. 357-361.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/85113
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact