We provide some counterexamples showing that some concepts of positive dependence arestrictly stronger than others. In particular we will settle two questions posed by Pemantle (J. Math. Phys. 41 (2000) 1371) and Pellerey (Personal communication, 2002) concerning respectively association versus weak association, weak association versus supermodular dependence, and supermodular dependence versus positive orthant dependence

Some counterexamples in positive dependence / Hu, T.; Mueller, A.; Scarsini, Marco. - In: JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE. - ISSN 0378-3758. - 124:(2004), pp. 153-158.

Some counterexamples in positive dependence

SCARSINI, MARCO
2004

Abstract

We provide some counterexamples showing that some concepts of positive dependence arestrictly stronger than others. In particular we will settle two questions posed by Pemantle (J. Math. Phys. 41 (2000) 1371) and Pellerey (Personal communication, 2002) concerning respectively association versus weak association, weak association versus supermodular dependence, and supermodular dependence versus positive orthant dependence
Some counterexamples in positive dependence / Hu, T.; Mueller, A.; Scarsini, Marco. - In: JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE. - ISSN 0378-3758. - 124:(2004), pp. 153-158.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JSPI2004HMS.PDF

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 176.2 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
176.2 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11385/3079
Citazioni
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact