An article on demandingness, aiming at showing how the main mitigation strategies -- i.e. the strategies aimed at mitigating the demands of impartial morality -- fail and how demandingness is ubiquitous, and not limited to consequentialism.

Pellegrino, Gianfranco. (2012). Beneficence, Justice and Demandingness: A Criticism of the Main Mitigation Strategies. In Aakash Singh Rathore; Sebastiano Maffettone (Eds.), Global Justice: Deparochializing the Debate (pp. 91-120). Routledge. Isbn: 978-0415535052.

Beneficence, Justice and Demandingness: A Criticism of the Main Mitigation Strategies

PELLEGRINO, GIANFRANCO
2012

Abstract

An article on demandingness, aiming at showing how the main mitigation strategies -- i.e. the strategies aimed at mitigating the demands of impartial morality -- fail and how demandingness is ubiquitous, and not limited to consequentialism.
2012
978-0415535052
Demandingness; Utilitarianism; Contractarianism; Justice
Pellegrino, Gianfranco. (2012). Beneficence, Justice and Demandingness: A Criticism of the Main Mitigation Strategies. In Aakash Singh Rathore; Sebastiano Maffettone (Eds.), Global Justice: Deparochializing the Debate (pp. 91-120). Routledge. Isbn: 978-0415535052.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Beneficence.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 436.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
436.73 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/30050
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact