Stibbard-Hawkes and von Rueden’s process-based account of egalitarianism provides a powerful framework for understanding how egalitarian systems coexist with inequality. Extending this perspective to modern organizations, we argue that such processes may inadvertently legitimize gender disparities. Equality initiatives that rely on moral signaling alone are insufficient; effective interventions must counterbalance the self-interested dynamics through which status and opportunity are allocated.
Calluso, Cinzia; Iacopino, Valentina. (2026). When egalitarianism legitimizes inequality: Implications for gender disparities in organizations. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, (ISSN: 0140-525X), 49: e424-e424. Doi: 10.1017/s0140525x26105871.
When egalitarianism legitimizes inequality: Implications for gender disparities in organizations
Calluso, Cinzia
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;Iacopino, ValentinaWriting – Original Draft Preparation
2026
Abstract
Stibbard-Hawkes and von Rueden’s process-based account of egalitarianism provides a powerful framework for understanding how egalitarian systems coexist with inequality. Extending this perspective to modern organizations, we argue that such processes may inadvertently legitimize gender disparities. Equality initiatives that rely on moral signaling alone are insufficient; effective interventions must counterbalance the self-interested dynamics through which status and opportunity are allocated.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Calluso&Iacopino.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
314.24 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
314.24 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



