Green growth policies aim to address both climate change and economic growth and are now prevalent throughout many economies. While green growth is sufficiently assessed in qualitative, case-study-based literature, quantitative and cross-country analyses are still limited. In response to this research deficit, our aim is twofold: (1) to develop a classification framework to quantitatively analyse green growth and (2) to identify key policy inputs and techno-economic or environmental outputs for green growth through a novel taxonomy. We focus on the G7 countries, since they have, historically, tended to align their economic policies. We employ a machine-automated K-means clustering algorithm, as well as correlation analyses, to assess where green growth “win–wins,” or co-benefits to the economy and environment, might exist. Our findings suggest that enthusiasm should be tempered for public policy commitments for green growth; despite unified green growth policy in G7 countries—significant differences are observed for both policy inputs and environmental/economic outputs. As a result, we caution policymakers and researchers against drawing generalised conclusions about the effectiveness of green growth policies, even among highly developed economies. Finally, our research draws attention to data deficiencies which, evidently, reduce more robust assessment across countries and over time.

Herman, Kyle Stuart; Kim, Y. J.; Shayegh, S.; Xiang, J.. (2023). A critical review of green growth indicators in G7 economies from 1990 to 2019. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, (ISSN: 1862-4065), 18:6, 2589-2604. Doi: 10.1007/s11625-023-01397-y.

A critical review of green growth indicators in G7 economies from 1990 to 2019

Herman K. S.
;
2023

Abstract

Green growth policies aim to address both climate change and economic growth and are now prevalent throughout many economies. While green growth is sufficiently assessed in qualitative, case-study-based literature, quantitative and cross-country analyses are still limited. In response to this research deficit, our aim is twofold: (1) to develop a classification framework to quantitatively analyse green growth and (2) to identify key policy inputs and techno-economic or environmental outputs for green growth through a novel taxonomy. We focus on the G7 countries, since they have, historically, tended to align their economic policies. We employ a machine-automated K-means clustering algorithm, as well as correlation analyses, to assess where green growth “win–wins,” or co-benefits to the economy and environment, might exist. Our findings suggest that enthusiasm should be tempered for public policy commitments for green growth; despite unified green growth policy in G7 countries—significant differences are observed for both policy inputs and environmental/economic outputs. As a result, we caution policymakers and researchers against drawing generalised conclusions about the effectiveness of green growth policies, even among highly developed economies. Finally, our research draws attention to data deficiencies which, evidently, reduce more robust assessment across countries and over time.
2023
Build back better
Economic growth
Environmental taxes
Environmental win–wins
Green growth
Machine learning
Herman, Kyle Stuart; Kim, Y. J.; Shayegh, S.; Xiang, J.. (2023). A critical review of green growth indicators in G7 economies from 1990 to 2019. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, (ISSN: 1862-4065), 18:6, 2589-2604. Doi: 10.1007/s11625-023-01397-y.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
unpaywall-bitstream-1411421509.pdf

Open Access

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 3.68 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.68 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/264478
Citazioni
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex 17
social impact