In the absence of regulatory capital requirements for climate-related financial risks, this paper studies the short-term effects of how the increased focus on these risks by the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) since 2020 has affected lending channels of European banks through credit reallocation and different credit spreads. By using an ad hoc methodology to infer firm-level emissions matched to supervisory microdata, I find that banks under the direct supervision of the SSM reallocated credit towards less polluting firms after the publication of the climate supervisory expectations. The results are robust to controlling for Covid-19 guaranteed loans, and the credit reallocation effect is entirely driven by the treated banks with climate commitments. The evidence is mixed when focusing on high-emitting borrowers who commit to reducing future carbon emissions, suggesting that forward-looking information plays a limited role for banks in the credit process. The results are useful for policymakers in assessing how supervisory actions could incentivize banks to manage climate-related risks better, and whether banks should divest from polluting companies or become more involved in supporting the transition.

Aiello, Maria Alessia. (2024). Climate supervisory shocks and bank lending: empirical evidence from microdata. TEMI DI DISCUSSIONE no. 1465. https://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/temi-discussione/2024/2024-1465/en_tema_1465.pdf?language_id=1

Climate supervisory shocks and bank lending: empirical evidence from microdata

aiello maria alessia
2024

Abstract

In the absence of regulatory capital requirements for climate-related financial risks, this paper studies the short-term effects of how the increased focus on these risks by the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) since 2020 has affected lending channels of European banks through credit reallocation and different credit spreads. By using an ad hoc methodology to infer firm-level emissions matched to supervisory microdata, I find that banks under the direct supervision of the SSM reallocated credit towards less polluting firms after the publication of the climate supervisory expectations. The results are robust to controlling for Covid-19 guaranteed loans, and the credit reallocation effect is entirely driven by the treated banks with climate commitments. The evidence is mixed when focusing on high-emitting borrowers who commit to reducing future carbon emissions, suggesting that forward-looking information plays a limited role for banks in the credit process. The results are useful for policymakers in assessing how supervisory actions could incentivize banks to manage climate-related risks better, and whether banks should divest from polluting companies or become more involved in supporting the transition.
2024
climate risk, climate stress test, carbon emissions, banking supervision, lending
Aiello, Maria Alessia. (2024). Climate supervisory shocks and bank lending: empirical evidence from microdata. TEMI DI DISCUSSIONE no. 1465. https://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/temi-discussione/2024/2024-1465/en_tema_1465.pdf?language_id=1
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
en_tema_1465.pdf

Open Access

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Non specificato (accesso aperto)
Dimensione 1.51 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.51 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/257901
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact