The relationship between multiculturalism and antidiscrimination is little understood. Contradictory claims and policies to some, they are of the same cloth to others. This article traces overlaps and tensions between both, in a comparison of the United States and Western Europe. Inherent in antidiscrimination is a tension between formal and substantive equality. It is the latter that provides an opening for a multicultural agenda, singling out specific minority groups for protection. In the United States, the domestic race problem has pushed a substantive and hence multicultural understanding of antidiscrimination from early on. By contrast, in Europe, the absence of a victimized minority group largely kept antidiscrimination in a formalistic mode, with an important exception for women. On both sides of the Atlantic, antidiscrimination, as practiced today with respect to racial and immigrant-based diversity, is individualistic and symmetric, and thus averse to multiculturalism. Yet this happened only with a fight in the United States, and quite without one in Europe.
Joppke, Christian Georg Maximilian. (2022). Multiculturalism and Antidiscrimination Law: Comparing the United States and Western Europe. Law & Business, 25: 59-89.
Multiculturalism and Antidiscrimination Law: Comparing the United States and Western Europe
Christian Joppke
2022
Abstract
The relationship between multiculturalism and antidiscrimination is little understood. Contradictory claims and policies to some, they are of the same cloth to others. This article traces overlaps and tensions between both, in a comparison of the United States and Western Europe. Inherent in antidiscrimination is a tension between formal and substantive equality. It is the latter that provides an opening for a multicultural agenda, singling out specific minority groups for protection. In the United States, the domestic race problem has pushed a substantive and hence multicultural understanding of antidiscrimination from early on. By contrast, in Europe, the absence of a victimized minority group largely kept antidiscrimination in a formalistic mode, with an important exception for women. On both sides of the Atlantic, antidiscrimination, as practiced today with respect to racial and immigrant-based diversity, is individualistic and symmetric, and thus averse to multiculturalism. Yet this happened only with a fight in the United States, and quite without one in Europe.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
idclawreview.2022.pdf
Open Access
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore (accesso aperto)
Dimensione
800.68 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
800.68 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



