The chapter conceptualises the Responsibility to Prosecute as a norm cluster in itself, encompassing the principles of universal jurisdiction and complementarity, and assesses its bipartite structure. Using this norm cluster framework, it proceeds to investigate how the norm has been contested by Sri Lankan leaders after the country’s 1983–2009 civil war and to show how impunity for war crimes has been made possible in post-conflict context, despite international calls for accountability. It hence explores and illustrates how, through the use of quasi-institutionalised ‘home-grown mechanisms’, the contestation of the international norm of Responsibility to Prosecute occurred by prioritising one founding principle—complementarity—over the other—universal jurisdiction. An implication of this case study is that to fully understand the effectiveness and robustness of an international norm, we should also look into the inherent clustering and linkage dynamics within the norm.

Conceptualising the Responsibility to Prosecute Norm as a Cluster: Impunity for War Crimes in Sri Lanka / Lucenti, Flavia; Ducci, Cecilia; Lee, Pak K.. - (2025), pp. 87-105. [10.1007/978-3-031-83639-8_5]

Conceptualising the Responsibility to Prosecute Norm as a Cluster: Impunity for War Crimes in Sri Lanka

Flavia Lucenti
;
2025

Abstract

The chapter conceptualises the Responsibility to Prosecute as a norm cluster in itself, encompassing the principles of universal jurisdiction and complementarity, and assesses its bipartite structure. Using this norm cluster framework, it proceeds to investigate how the norm has been contested by Sri Lankan leaders after the country’s 1983–2009 civil war and to show how impunity for war crimes has been made possible in post-conflict context, despite international calls for accountability. It hence explores and illustrates how, through the use of quasi-institutionalised ‘home-grown mechanisms’, the contestation of the international norm of Responsibility to Prosecute occurred by prioritising one founding principle—complementarity—over the other—universal jurisdiction. An implication of this case study is that to fully understand the effectiveness and robustness of an international norm, we should also look into the inherent clustering and linkage dynamics within the norm.
2025
978-3-031-83639-8
978-3-031-83638-1
IR theory; Sri Lanka; War Crimes; Non-impunity; Norm Cluster; Sri Lankan civil war
Conceptualising the Responsibility to Prosecute Norm as a Cluster: Impunity for War Crimes in Sri Lanka / Lucenti, Flavia; Ducci, Cecilia; Lee, Pak K.. - (2025), pp. 87-105. [10.1007/978-3-031-83639-8_5]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Lucenti, F., Ducci, C., Lee, P.K. (2025). Conceptualising the Responsibility to Prosecute Norm as a Cluster Impunity for War Crimes in Sri Lanka.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Lucenti, F., Ducci, C., Lee, P.K. (2025). Conceptualising the Responsibility to Prosecute Norm as a Cluster Impunity for War Crimes in Sri Lanka.
Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 6.1 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.1 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/249480
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact