Accertamento del fatto e intelligenza artificiale nel processo civile

The paper examines the divergent fate of the use of AI systems, which, when employed in a subservient function (as judicial notice), aid the ascertainment of the truth of a fact; but, when investigated in themselves (as defective products), seem to be subject to formal solutions, evasive of the truth. Of course, the barrier of the dispositive principle and the burden of proof as rationale remains fragile.

Lo scritto esamina la divergente sorte dell’impiego dei sistemi di AI, i quali, se utilizzati in veste servente (a mo’ di notorio giudiziale), aiutano l’accertamento della verità di un fatto; ma, se investigati in sé (come prodotti difettosi), si prestano, al contrario, a soluzioni elusive e verifobiche. In ultimo, rimane fragile la barriera del principio dispositivo e della regola di giudizio fondata sull’onere della prova. The paper examines the divergent fate of the use of AI systems, which, when employed in a subservient function (as judicial notice), aid the ascertainment of the truth of a fact; but, when investigated in themselves (as defective products), seem to be subject to formal solutions, evasive of the truth. Of course, the barrier of the dispositive principle and the burden of proof as rationale remains fragile