The essay examines the progressive hegemonic role of the Court of Cassation and, in contrast, the corresponding marginalization of the Attorney General despite the fact that, by Constitution, the same Agent is fully intimate with the Court itself. Therefore, the text proposes the involvement of the Attorney General in the selection, based on art. 380-bis c.p.c., of inadmissible or manifestly unfounded appeals so as to ensure a new duality at the apex of Judiciary.
The Court of Cassation in Italy after the Cartabia reform / Auletta, Ferruccio. - (2024), pp. 123-131.
The Court of Cassation in Italy after the Cartabia reform
F. Auletta
2024
Abstract
The essay examines the progressive hegemonic role of the Court of Cassation and, in contrast, the corresponding marginalization of the Attorney General despite the fact that, by Constitution, the same Agent is fully intimate with the Court itself. Therefore, the text proposes the involvement of the Attorney General in the selection, based on art. 380-bis c.p.c., of inadmissible or manifestly unfounded appeals so as to ensure a new duality at the apex of Judiciary.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Sistema Brasileiro de Precedentes.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
2.35 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.35 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
