World economy and world science have not yet found a counterpart in a world state and probably never will. However, the contours of a political system have emerged, which fulfil the functions of statehood at the global level. Such a system does not take the form of a uniform corporative-hierarchical collectivity but of networked statehood, ie a network of individual states, international organisations, and transnational regimes. Relying on social science and legal constructions, this article offers a positive and negative definition of this concept and an analysis of its intrinsically self-contradictory character traits. Despite these unavoidable contradictions, this article argues that networked statehood still provides considerable advantages and outlines general principles of a future law of networked statehood. These outlines are founded on the belief that networked statehood must be seen as a new and distinct legal form of action but likewise facing the problem of democratic legitimacy.
Networked statehood: an institutionalised self-contradiction in the process of globalisation? / Golia, Angelo Junior; Teubner, G. - In: TRANSNATIONAL LEGAL THEORY. - ISSN 2041-4005. - 12:1(2021), pp. 7-43. [10.1080/20414005.2021.1927608]
Networked statehood: an institutionalised self-contradiction in the process of globalisation?
Golia A;
2021
Abstract
World economy and world science have not yet found a counterpart in a world state and probably never will. However, the contours of a political system have emerged, which fulfil the functions of statehood at the global level. Such a system does not take the form of a uniform corporative-hierarchical collectivity but of networked statehood, ie a network of individual states, international organisations, and transnational regimes. Relying on social science and legal constructions, this article offers a positive and negative definition of this concept and an analysis of its intrinsically self-contradictory character traits. Despite these unavoidable contradictions, this article argues that networked statehood still provides considerable advantages and outlines general principles of a future law of networked statehood. These outlines are founded on the belief that networked statehood must be seen as a new and distinct legal form of action but likewise facing the problem of democratic legitimacy.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Golia_Networked statehood.pdf
Open Access
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
2.76 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.76 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.