The article analyses the effect on the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate of the rupture between the political parties of “Azione” and “Italia Viva”, happened in Fall 2023. The consequences of the breakdown of the agreement between the two political parties determined the end of the single parliamentary groups that, both in the Chamber of Deputies and in the Senate, had been formed at the beginning of the nineteenth legislature. The rules on groups have been put to the test following the reduction in the number of parliamentarians and, therefore, above all the new rules on the constitution of groups in the Senate, which between 2017 and 2022 provided for a much more complex discipline on the subject than in the Chamber of Deputies: in both houses of Parliament, the Committees for the Rules of Procedure were involved and in the Senate the solution was found as a result of the mediation of the President of the Assembly, with an arbitral “La Russa award”. The asymmetry in the rules has produced results that are partly different: in the Chamber of Deputies there was the constitution of two parliamentary groups “in derogation” (with the addition of two members, one from the new group and one from the majority, to the Bureau), while in the Senate “Italia Viva” remained as a group and “Azione” was constituted as a political component of the mixed group
Il contributo analizza l’effetto sui gruppi di Camera e Senato della rottura tra “Azione” e “Italia Viva”, avvenuta nell’autunno 2023. Le conseguenze della rottura dell’accordo tra le due formazioni politiche si sono prodotte anche all’interno del Parlamento e, in particolare, sul destino dei gruppi unici che, sia alla Camera, sia al Senato, si erano formati all’inizio della XIX legislatura. Sono così state messe alla prova le regole sui gruppi in seguito alla riduzione del numero dei parlamentari e, quindi, soprattutto le nuove regole sulla costituzione dei gruppi presso il Senato, che tra 2017 e 2022 ha previsto in tema una disciplina molto più complessa rispetto alla Camera. In entrambi i rami del Parlamento sono state coinvolte le Giunte per il regolamento e, al Senato, la soluzione si è trovata per effetto della mediazione arbitrale del Presidente di Assemblea, con un “lodo La Russa”. L’asimmetria nelle regole ha prodotto risultati in parte diversi: alla Camera si è avuta la costituzione di due gruppi "in deroga" (con l’aggiunta di due membri, uno del nuovo gruppo e uno di maggioranza, all’Ufficio di Presidenza), mentre al Senato Italia Viva è rimasta gruppo e Azione si è costituita come componente politica del gruppo misto.
L’effetto sui gruppi di Camera e Senato della rottura tra Azione e Italia Viva, tra asimmetrie (regolamentari) e simmetrie (nella prassi applicativa) / Bartolucci, Luca; Lupo, Nicola. - In: OSSERVATORIO SULLE FONTI. - ISSN 2038-5633. - 16:3(2023), pp. 161-183.
L’effetto sui gruppi di Camera e Senato della rottura tra Azione e Italia Viva, tra asimmetrie (regolamentari) e simmetrie (nella prassi applicativa)
Luca Bartolucci;Nicola Lupo
2023
Abstract
The article analyses the effect on the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate of the rupture between the political parties of “Azione” and “Italia Viva”, happened in Fall 2023. The consequences of the breakdown of the agreement between the two political parties determined the end of the single parliamentary groups that, both in the Chamber of Deputies and in the Senate, had been formed at the beginning of the nineteenth legislature. The rules on groups have been put to the test following the reduction in the number of parliamentarians and, therefore, above all the new rules on the constitution of groups in the Senate, which between 2017 and 2022 provided for a much more complex discipline on the subject than in the Chamber of Deputies: in both houses of Parliament, the Committees for the Rules of Procedure were involved and in the Senate the solution was found as a result of the mediation of the President of the Assembly, with an arbitral “La Russa award”. The asymmetry in the rules has produced results that are partly different: in the Chamber of Deputies there was the constitution of two parliamentary groups “in derogation” (with the addition of two members, one from the new group and one from the majority, to the Bureau), while in the Senate “Italia Viva” remained as a group and “Azione” was constituted as a political component of the mixed groupFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
OSF 3 2023 Bartolucci Lupo.pdf
Open Access
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
DRM (Digital rights management) non definiti
Dimensione
233.03 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
233.03 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.