Generative AI is disrupting the creative process(es) of intellectual works on an unparalleled scale. Algorithmic tools are increasing users’ production capacity of literary and artistic works to almost infinite levels. However, the quality of the outputs is strictly dependent on the quantity and quality of the inputs, some of which are protected by copyright. This scenario gave rise to tensions between copyright holders and generative AI companies. While the formers claim control over this new kind of exploitation of their works, the latters wish to train their algorithms freely with as many contents as possible. This contribution suggests exploring the idea of introducing a statutory license for machine learning purposes as a compromise solution to ensure an attractive environment for the development of artificial intelligence without marginalizing the role played by human authors. This remuneration proposal is rooted in a fundamental rights analysis that balances i.e., the right to science and culture and freedom of artistic expression (Arts. 11 and 13 EUCF, 19 UDHR, 27.1 UDHR, 15.1 a and b ICESCR) vis-à-vis the right for creators to benefit from the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from their scientific, literary or artistic production (Arts. 17.2 EUCF, 27.2 UDHR, and 15.1 c ICESCR).

The Forgotten Creator: Towards a Statutory Remuneration Right for Machine Learning of Generative AI / Geiger, Christophe; Iaia, Vincenzo. - In: COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW. - ISSN 2212-473X. - 52:(2024), pp. 1-9. [10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105925]

The Forgotten Creator: Towards a Statutory Remuneration Right for Machine Learning of Generative AI

Geiger, Christophe
;
Iaia, Vincenzo
2024

Abstract

Generative AI is disrupting the creative process(es) of intellectual works on an unparalleled scale. Algorithmic tools are increasing users’ production capacity of literary and artistic works to almost infinite levels. However, the quality of the outputs is strictly dependent on the quantity and quality of the inputs, some of which are protected by copyright. This scenario gave rise to tensions between copyright holders and generative AI companies. While the formers claim control over this new kind of exploitation of their works, the latters wish to train their algorithms freely with as many contents as possible. This contribution suggests exploring the idea of introducing a statutory license for machine learning purposes as a compromise solution to ensure an attractive environment for the development of artificial intelligence without marginalizing the role played by human authors. This remuneration proposal is rooted in a fundamental rights analysis that balances i.e., the right to science and culture and freedom of artistic expression (Arts. 11 and 13 EUCF, 19 UDHR, 27.1 UDHR, 15.1 a and b ICESCR) vis-à-vis the right for creators to benefit from the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from their scientific, literary or artistic production (Arts. 17.2 EUCF, 27.2 UDHR, and 15.1 c ICESCR).
2024
Copyright, Fundamental rights, Generative AI, Algorithmic creativity, Statutory license, Fair remuneration
The Forgotten Creator: Towards a Statutory Remuneration Right for Machine Learning of Generative AI / Geiger, Christophe; Iaia, Vincenzo. - In: COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW. - ISSN 2212-473X. - 52:(2024), pp. 1-9. [10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105925]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
C. Geiger and V. Iaia, The forgotten creator- Towards a statutory remuneration right for machine.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 472.4 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
472.4 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/235699
Citazioni
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact