This chapter critically analyses the inclusion of intellectual property (IP) in the investment chapters of free trade agreements and bilateral investment treaties as well as their submission to their related investor state dispute settlement (ISDS). It argues that these developments pose a serious threat to a balanced and ethical innovation system. In part this is because when regulating IP to foster non-economic interests, the possibility of ISDS creates uncertainty about the ability of states to protect human rights and matters of public interest by limiting IP rights, even when such action is perfectly legitimated by the international IP system and its flexibilities. The COVID pandemic health crisis showed how important it can be for the EU, the global community and for individual States to provide access to vaccines and treatment, and how unacceptable it might be for transnational corporations to use ISDS to limit this life-saving activity. As a result, it is argued that IP should in the future be excluded from the investment chapter of bilateral trade and investment treaties.

Excluding Intellectual Property from Bilateral Trade and Investment Agreements: A Lesson from the Global Health Crisis / Geiger, Christophe. - (2023), pp. 426-435.

Excluding Intellectual Property from Bilateral Trade and Investment Agreements: A Lesson from the Global Health Crisis

Geiger, Christophe
2023

Abstract

This chapter critically analyses the inclusion of intellectual property (IP) in the investment chapters of free trade agreements and bilateral investment treaties as well as their submission to their related investor state dispute settlement (ISDS). It argues that these developments pose a serious threat to a balanced and ethical innovation system. In part this is because when regulating IP to foster non-economic interests, the possibility of ISDS creates uncertainty about the ability of states to protect human rights and matters of public interest by limiting IP rights, even when such action is perfectly legitimated by the international IP system and its flexibilities. The COVID pandemic health crisis showed how important it can be for the EU, the global community and for individual States to provide access to vaccines and treatment, and how unacceptable it might be for transnational corporations to use ISDS to limit this life-saving activity. As a result, it is argued that IP should in the future be excluded from the investment chapter of bilateral trade and investment treaties.
2023
978-1-0353-1085-2
Investment, bilateral trade and investments treaties, dispute settlement, human rights, intellectual property, regulation
Excluding Intellectual Property from Bilateral Trade and Investment Agreements: A Lesson from the Global Health Crisis / Geiger, Christophe. - (2023), pp. 426-435.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Excluding intellectual property from bilateral trade and investment agreements, A lesson from the global health crisis.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 267.72 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
267.72 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/235698
Citazioni
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact