Has the EU been able to learn from the experience of the Euro crisis to shape its economic response to the pandemic? This contribution is aimed at showing that an effective learning process was in fact set in motion in the aftermath of the pandemic emergency, although it is still incomplete. In order to address the economic consequences of the Covid-19 outbreak, and drawing on the past experience of the Euro-crisis, through Next Generation EU (NGEU) a new method of government has been forged. Grounded on a creative interpretative of the legal bases and characterized by a procedure that it is partly national and partly European and involving both domestic and supranational institutions, the governance of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) proceeds through the setting of EU-wide priorities, their articulation in national medium-term and performance-based plans, and a continuous monitoring process carried out by the Commission to ascertain the compliance with multiple conditionality regimes. The first two years of implementation of the RRF have proved successful not only for the use of the Fund by the Member States, but also for the spread of the RRF method of government in other areas of EU law, including the European Semester, RePowerEU, and the ongoing reform of the Stability and Growth Pact, despite the uncertainties surrounding the temporary nature of the instrument and some weaknesses in terms of democratic accountability.

Learning from the Euro-crisis. A new method of government for the EU economic policy coordination after the pandemic? / Fasone, Cristina; Lupo, Nicola. - In: STALS. - ISSN 1974-5656. - 4(2023), pp. 1-24.

Learning from the Euro-crisis. A new method of government for the EU economic policy coordination after the pandemic?

Cristina Fasone;Nicola Lupo
2023

Abstract

Has the EU been able to learn from the experience of the Euro crisis to shape its economic response to the pandemic? This contribution is aimed at showing that an effective learning process was in fact set in motion in the aftermath of the pandemic emergency, although it is still incomplete. In order to address the economic consequences of the Covid-19 outbreak, and drawing on the past experience of the Euro-crisis, through Next Generation EU (NGEU) a new method of government has been forged. Grounded on a creative interpretative of the legal bases and characterized by a procedure that it is partly national and partly European and involving both domestic and supranational institutions, the governance of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) proceeds through the setting of EU-wide priorities, their articulation in national medium-term and performance-based plans, and a continuous monitoring process carried out by the Commission to ascertain the compliance with multiple conditionality regimes. The first two years of implementation of the RRF have proved successful not only for the use of the Fund by the Member States, but also for the spread of the RRF method of government in other areas of EU law, including the European Semester, RePowerEU, and the ongoing reform of the Stability and Growth Pact, despite the uncertainties surrounding the temporary nature of the instrument and some weaknesses in terms of democratic accountability.
2023
Next Generation EU, Method of Government, Euro crisis, Conditionality, European Semester, Stability, Growth Pact
Learning from the Euro-crisis. A new method of government for the EU economic policy coordination after the pandemic? / Fasone, Cristina; Lupo, Nicola. - In: STALS. - ISSN 1974-5656. - 4(2023), pp. 1-24.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1Stals_Fasone_Lupo.pdf

Open Access

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: DRM (Digital rights management) non definiti
Dimensione 534.8 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
534.8 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/234890
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact