Research on “innovation” has focused mainly on its technological and economic varieties, but there are at present relatively few studies about innovation in social and political contexts. In view of the limited number of relevant studies, this article explores the understanding of innovation from the perspective of Political Science — as well as the Social Sciences more broadly. The first part discusses the concept of “political innovation” by referring to three major characteristics thereof: novelty; crises, risks, and social needs as innovation triggers; and, finally, social impact. We draw attention to the continuing difficulty of drawing a clear dividing line between it and other phenomena such as “change,” “reform,” or “revolution.” Following the term defining first part, the second half of the article explores the application of the concept within political and academic debates in two East Asian countries, China and South Korea, pointing out the discursive relationships between innovation and reform. The article concludes with a discussion of the differences between the two countries in terms of the application of the political innovation concept, as well as between their core understandings of it and those interpretations thereof that are dominant in the West.

The Concept of “Political Innovation” and Its Application in China and South Korea / Le, Weijing; Guahk, Youngah. - In: ASIEN. - ISSN 0721-5231. - 142:JANUAR 2017(2017), pp. 32-53.

The Concept of “Political Innovation” and Its Application in China and South Korea

Guahk, Youngah
2017

Abstract

Research on “innovation” has focused mainly on its technological and economic varieties, but there are at present relatively few studies about innovation in social and political contexts. In view of the limited number of relevant studies, this article explores the understanding of innovation from the perspective of Political Science — as well as the Social Sciences more broadly. The first part discusses the concept of “political innovation” by referring to three major characteristics thereof: novelty; crises, risks, and social needs as innovation triggers; and, finally, social impact. We draw attention to the continuing difficulty of drawing a clear dividing line between it and other phenomena such as “change,” “reform,” or “revolution.” Following the term defining first part, the second half of the article explores the application of the concept within political and academic debates in two East Asian countries, China and South Korea, pointing out the discursive relationships between innovation and reform. The article concludes with a discussion of the differences between the two countries in terms of the application of the political innovation concept, as well as between their core understandings of it and those interpretations thereof that are dominant in the West.
2017
Political innovation, reform, innovation discourse, China, Korea.
The Concept of “Political Innovation” and Its Application in China and South Korea / Le, Weijing; Guahk, Youngah. - In: ASIEN. - ISSN 0721-5231. - 142:JANUAR 2017(2017), pp. 32-53.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
05_RA_Le_Guahk_PoliticalInnovationinChinaandKorea_noch-nicht-präfinal.pdf

Open Access

Descrizione: published article
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 155.25 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
155.25 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/224679
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact