According to the accepted wisdom in security studies, unmanned aerial vehicles, also known as drones, have revolutionizing effects on war and world politics. Drones allegedly tilt the military balance in favor of the offense, reduce existing asymmetries in military power between major and minor actors, and eliminate close combat from modern battlefields. A new theory about the hider-finder competition between air penetration and air defense shows that drones are vulnerable to air defenses and electronic warfare systems, and that they require support from other force structure assets to be effective. This competition imposes high costs on those who fail to master the set of tactics, techniques, procedures, technologies, and capabilities necessary to limit exposure to enemy fire and to detect enemy targets. Three conflicts that featured extensive employment of drones—the Western Libya military campaign of the second Libyan civil war (2019–2020), the Syrian civil war (2011–2021), and the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh (2020)—probe the mechanisms of the theory. Drones do not by themselves produce the revolutionary effects that many have attributed to them.

Why Drones Have Not Revolutionized War: The Enduring Hider-Finder Competition in Air Warfare / Marchetti, Raffaele; Gilli, Andrea; Mauro, Gilli; Calcara, Antonio; Ivan, Zaccagnini. - In: INTERNATIONAL SECURITY. - ISSN 1531-4804. - 46:4(2022), pp. 130-171. [10.1162/isec_a_00431]

Why Drones Have Not Revolutionized War: The Enduring Hider-Finder Competition in Air Warfare

marchetti Raffaele;Andrea gilli;antonio calcara
;
2022

Abstract

According to the accepted wisdom in security studies, unmanned aerial vehicles, also known as drones, have revolutionizing effects on war and world politics. Drones allegedly tilt the military balance in favor of the offense, reduce existing asymmetries in military power between major and minor actors, and eliminate close combat from modern battlefields. A new theory about the hider-finder competition between air penetration and air defense shows that drones are vulnerable to air defenses and electronic warfare systems, and that they require support from other force structure assets to be effective. This competition imposes high costs on those who fail to master the set of tactics, techniques, procedures, technologies, and capabilities necessary to limit exposure to enemy fire and to detect enemy targets. Three conflicts that featured extensive employment of drones—the Western Libya military campaign of the second Libyan civil war (2019–2020), the Syrian civil war (2011–2021), and the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh (2020)—probe the mechanisms of the theory. Drones do not by themselves produce the revolutionary effects that many have attributed to them.
2022
Security, Drones, Defense
Why Drones Have Not Revolutionized War: The Enduring Hider-Finder Competition in Air Warfare / Marchetti, Raffaele; Gilli, Andrea; Mauro, Gilli; Calcara, Antonio; Ivan, Zaccagnini. - In: INTERNATIONAL SECURITY. - ISSN 1531-4804. - 46:4(2022), pp. 130-171. [10.1162/isec_a_00431]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2022Calcara-Gilli-etal.pdf

Open Access

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 292.26 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
292.26 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/217877
Citazioni
  • Scopus 25
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 27
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact