The climate crisis demands a strong response from policy-makers worldwide. The current global climate policy agenda requires technological change, innovation, labour markets and the financial system to be led towards an orderly and rapid low-carbon transition. Yet progress has been slow and incremental. Inadequacies of policy appraisal frameworks used worldwide may be significant contributors to the problem, as they frequently fail to adequately account for the dynamics of societal and technological change. Risks are underestimated, and the economic opportunities from innovation are generally not assessed in practice. Here, we identify root causes of those inadequacies and identify them to structural features of standard analysis frameworks. We use a review of theoretical principles of complexity science and the science of dynamical systems and formulate a generalisation of existing frameworks for policy analysis and the appraisal of outcomes of proposed policy strategies, to help better identify and frame situations of transformational change. We use the term “risk-opportunity analysis” to capture the generalised approach, in which conventional economic cost-benefit analysis is a special case. New guiding principles for policy-making during dynamic and transformational change are offered.

Risk-opportunity analysis for transformative policy design and appraisal / Mercure, Jean-Francois; Sharpe, Simon; Vinuales, Jorge Enrique; Ives, Matthew; Grubb, Michael; Lam, Aileen; Drummond, Paul; Pollitt, Hector; Knobloch, Florian; Nijsse, Femke. - In: GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS. - ISSN 0959-3780. - 70:September(2021), pp. 1-13. [10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102359]

Risk-opportunity analysis for transformative policy design and appraisal

Vinuales, Jorge;
2021

Abstract

The climate crisis demands a strong response from policy-makers worldwide. The current global climate policy agenda requires technological change, innovation, labour markets and the financial system to be led towards an orderly and rapid low-carbon transition. Yet progress has been slow and incremental. Inadequacies of policy appraisal frameworks used worldwide may be significant contributors to the problem, as they frequently fail to adequately account for the dynamics of societal and technological change. Risks are underestimated, and the economic opportunities from innovation are generally not assessed in practice. Here, we identify root causes of those inadequacies and identify them to structural features of standard analysis frameworks. We use a review of theoretical principles of complexity science and the science of dynamical systems and formulate a generalisation of existing frameworks for policy analysis and the appraisal of outcomes of proposed policy strategies, to help better identify and frame situations of transformational change. We use the term “risk-opportunity analysis” to capture the generalised approach, in which conventional economic cost-benefit analysis is a special case. New guiding principles for policy-making during dynamic and transformational change are offered.
2021
Policy appraisal; Climate policy; Science-policy interface; Complexity science; Evolutionary economics; Public policy-making.
Risk-opportunity analysis for transformative policy design and appraisal / Mercure, Jean-Francois; Sharpe, Simon; Vinuales, Jorge Enrique; Ives, Matthew; Grubb, Michael; Lam, Aileen; Drummond, Paul; Pollitt, Hector; Knobloch, Florian; Nijsse, Femke. - In: GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS. - ISSN 0959-3780. - 70:September(2021), pp. 1-13. [10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102359]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0959378021001382-main.pdf

Open Access

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.51 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.51 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/214877
Citazioni
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
social impact