The new European economic governance has made the creation or reform of independent fiscal institutions (IFIs) compulsory, in particular for Eurozone countries. While these institutions have been subject to extensive investigation by the economic literature, a constitutional analysis of their prospective and actual impact on national legal systems is lacking. In fact, depending on their design and powers, they could alter the ordinary inter-institutional dynamics on budgetary decisions. IFIs could redress the marginalization of parliaments in budgetary procedures in so far as they are able to offer reliable and independent information from the executive and should mechanisms of “comply or explain” be put in place. By contrast, in the event an IFI operates within the executive branch and is not autonomous in the exercise of its mandate, parliamentary accountability could be further jeopardized. IFIs could also affect democratic rule-making over the budget, should their technocratic determinations be able to replace those of the budgetary authorities. Through a comparative constitutional analysis and based on selected case studies (France, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands), the article aims to assess the constitutional impact of IFIs on parliaments and on the problem of information asymmetry on the budget.
The Constitutional Role of Independent Fiscal Institutions in the Eurozone / Fasone, Cristina. - In: GERMAN LAW JOURNAL. - ISSN 2071-8322. - 23:2(2022), pp. 257-279. [10.1017/glj.2022.13]
The Constitutional Role of Independent Fiscal Institutions in the Eurozone
Fasone
2022
Abstract
The new European economic governance has made the creation or reform of independent fiscal institutions (IFIs) compulsory, in particular for Eurozone countries. While these institutions have been subject to extensive investigation by the economic literature, a constitutional analysis of their prospective and actual impact on national legal systems is lacking. In fact, depending on their design and powers, they could alter the ordinary inter-institutional dynamics on budgetary decisions. IFIs could redress the marginalization of parliaments in budgetary procedures in so far as they are able to offer reliable and independent information from the executive and should mechanisms of “comply or explain” be put in place. By contrast, in the event an IFI operates within the executive branch and is not autonomous in the exercise of its mandate, parliamentary accountability could be further jeopardized. IFIs could also affect democratic rule-making over the budget, should their technocratic determinations be able to replace those of the budgetary authorities. Through a comparative constitutional analysis and based on selected case studies (France, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands), the article aims to assess the constitutional impact of IFIs on parliaments and on the problem of information asymmetry on the budget.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Fasone German Law Journal.pdf
Open Access
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
276.63 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
276.63 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.