In the International Criminal Court case of The Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi, neither the Prosecutor nor the Court addressed the issue of whether attacks on cultural heritage can be tried as crimes against humanity under Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC, provided that they are part of a widespread or systematic attack against the civilian population and are committed with knowledge of such attack. Even though his actions were part of a wider persecutory plan against the civilian population, Al Mahdi was held responsible only for war crimes for the intentional destruction of historical buildings during the Islamist occupation of the Malian city of Timbuktu, between April 2012 and January 2013. This raises the question whether one should conclude that attacks on cultural heritage simply cannot be tried as crimes against humanity before the ICC. This paper argues that the Al Mahdi judgment does not prevent attacks on cultural property from being tried as crimes against humanity and that the categorization of certain attacks on cultural heritage as crimes against humanity may have practical implications for the selection and prioritization of cases by the Office of the Prosecutor.

The Al Mahdi Trial before the International Criminal Court: Attacks on Cultural Heritage Between War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity / Rossi, Pierfrancesco. - In: DIRITTI UMANI E DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE. - ISSN 1971-7105. - 11:1(2017), pp. 87-100. [10.12829/86205]

The Al Mahdi Trial before the International Criminal Court: Attacks on Cultural Heritage Between War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity

Rossi, Pierfrancesco
2017

Abstract

In the International Criminal Court case of The Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi, neither the Prosecutor nor the Court addressed the issue of whether attacks on cultural heritage can be tried as crimes against humanity under Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC, provided that they are part of a widespread or systematic attack against the civilian population and are committed with knowledge of such attack. Even though his actions were part of a wider persecutory plan against the civilian population, Al Mahdi was held responsible only for war crimes for the intentional destruction of historical buildings during the Islamist occupation of the Malian city of Timbuktu, between April 2012 and January 2013. This raises the question whether one should conclude that attacks on cultural heritage simply cannot be tried as crimes against humanity before the ICC. This paper argues that the Al Mahdi judgment does not prevent attacks on cultural property from being tried as crimes against humanity and that the categorization of certain attacks on cultural heritage as crimes against humanity may have practical implications for the selection and prioritization of cases by the Office of the Prosecutor.
International Criminal Court; attacks on cultural heritage; war crimes; crimes against humanity of persecution; concurrence of crimes
The Al Mahdi Trial before the International Criminal Court: Attacks on Cultural Heritage Between War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity / Rossi, Pierfrancesco. - In: DIRITTI UMANI E DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE. - ISSN 1971-7105. - 11:1(2017), pp. 87-100. [10.12829/86205]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
The Al Mahdi Trial Before the International Criminal Court - Attacks on Cultural Heritage Between War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity (2017).pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 228.8 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
228.8 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/209657
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact