We discuss how different models assessing climate change integrate aspects of structural change that are crucial to improve understanding of the relation between changes in the environment and in the economy. We identify six related aspects of structural change, which have significant impact on climate change: sectoral composition, industrial organisation, technology, employment, final demand, and institutions. Economic models vary substantially with respect to the aspects of structural change that they include, and how they model them. We review different modelling families and compare these differences: integrated assessment models (IAM), computable general equilibrium (CGE) models, structural change models (SCM), ecological macroeconomics models in the Keynesian tradition (EMK) and evolutionary agent based models (EABM). We find that IAM and CGE address few of the aspects of structural change identified; SCM focus on the sectoral composition; and EKM study final demand and employment structure. But all these models are aggregate and omit the complexity of the interactions between structural and climate change. EABM have explored a larger number of aspects of structural change, modelling their emergence from the interaction of microeconomic actors, but have not yet exploited their potential to study the interactions among interrelated aspects of structural and climate change. © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Modelling the evolution of economic structure and climate change: a review / Ciarli, Tommaso; Savona, Maria. - In: ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS. - ISSN 0921-8009. - 158:(2019), pp. 51-64. [10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.008]

Modelling the evolution of economic structure and climate change: a review

Savona, Maria
2019

Abstract

We discuss how different models assessing climate change integrate aspects of structural change that are crucial to improve understanding of the relation between changes in the environment and in the economy. We identify six related aspects of structural change, which have significant impact on climate change: sectoral composition, industrial organisation, technology, employment, final demand, and institutions. Economic models vary substantially with respect to the aspects of structural change that they include, and how they model them. We review different modelling families and compare these differences: integrated assessment models (IAM), computable general equilibrium (CGE) models, structural change models (SCM), ecological macroeconomics models in the Keynesian tradition (EMK) and evolutionary agent based models (EABM). We find that IAM and CGE address few of the aspects of structural change identified; SCM focus on the sectoral composition; and EKM study final demand and employment structure. But all these models are aggregate and omit the complexity of the interactions between structural and climate change. EABM have explored a larger number of aspects of structural change, modelling their emergence from the interaction of microeconomic actors, but have not yet exploited their potential to study the interactions among interrelated aspects of structural and climate change. © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
2019
Modelling the evolution of economic structure and climate change: a review / Ciarli, Tommaso; Savona, Maria. - In: ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS. - ISSN 0921-8009. - 158:(2019), pp. 51-64. [10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.008]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ciarli and Savona - Modeling the Evolution of Economic Structure and climate change. A review.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: DRM (Digital rights management) non definiti
Dimensione 995.95 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
995.95 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/198179
Citazioni
  • Scopus 43
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 34
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact