In this chapter I present two major divergent lines of thought that read European Islam differently, though this difference has hardly been problematised and remarked before, nor has it been put face to face in a scholarly debate. This chapter then presents the views of two major scholars of Islam and Muslims in Europe: those of the French scholar Olivier Roy, and those of the Danish scholar Jørgen S. Nielsen. My own reading of European Islam makes me stand with the latter on his position: European Muslims are making their own theology; it is a pluralist theology in progress. It may even be inspiring to the Arab-Islamic world.

Does European Islam Think? / Hashas, Mohammed. - (2018), pp. 35-49.

Does European Islam Think?

Mohammed Hashas
2018

Abstract

In this chapter I present two major divergent lines of thought that read European Islam differently, though this difference has hardly been problematised and remarked before, nor has it been put face to face in a scholarly debate. This chapter then presents the views of two major scholars of Islam and Muslims in Europe: those of the French scholar Olivier Roy, and those of the Danish scholar Jørgen S. Nielsen. My own reading of European Islam makes me stand with the latter on his position: European Muslims are making their own theology; it is a pluralist theology in progress. It may even be inspiring to the Arab-Islamic world.
2018
978-90-04-36249-9
Islam in Europe, European Islam, Sociology of Islam
Does European Islam Think? / Hashas, Mohammed. - (2018), pp. 35-49.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Article11 Hashas Does European Islam Think? chapt Brill 2018.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: DRM (Digital rights management) non definiti
Dimensione 777.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
777.73 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/196703
Citazioni
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact