Ethical considerations in today’s businesses are manifold and range from human rights issues and the well-being of employees to income inequality and environmental sustainability. Regardless of the specific topic being investigated, an integral part of business ethics research consists of deeply comprehending the personal meanings, intentions, behaviors, judgements, and attitudes that people possess. To this end, researchers are often encouraged to use more qualitative methods to understand the dynamic and fuzzy field of business ethics, which involves collecting in-depth information in real time. Qualitative methods in business ethics research, however, raise the two-fold responsibility of not only conducting such investigations fairly and appropriately, but also clearly communicating the research processes and outcomes to readers. Especially leading journals in the field such as Journal of Business Ethics have a responsibility to conduct their business (i.e., the business of high standard publishing) ethically, by making sure that their content represents clear and honest communications of research concerning a wide range of business systems. Unfortunately, the question of how to effectively facilitate transparent insight into the research process of qualitative business ethics studies is still unresolved. Both the lack of a clear communication of methods and results and the iterative nature of qualitative methods often make it difficult for the readers to properly assess a qualitative business ethics study and understand its results. We propose the use of narratives to remedy this situation. Specifically, we suggest a new classification of audits, named second-party audits, to facilitate a better understanding of research procedures ex-post for the readers. To illustrate this new narrative-based reconceptualization of audits, we use Agatha Christie’s detective novel The Murder on the Links as a frame of reference.
From ‘whodunnit’ to ‘how’: Detective stories and auditability in qualitative business ethics research / Balachandran Nair, Lakshmi. - In: JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS. - ISSN 0167-4544. - DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04479-4(2020), pp. ---. [10.1007/s10551-020-04479-4]
|Titolo:||From ‘whodunnit’ to ‘how’: Detective stories and auditability in qualitative business ethics research|
Balachandran Nair, Lakshmi (Corresponding)
|Data di pubblicazione:||2020|
|Citazione:||From ‘whodunnit’ to ‘how’: Detective stories and auditability in qualitative business ethics research / Balachandran Nair, Lakshmi. - In: JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS. - ISSN 0167-4544. - DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04479-4(2020), pp. ---. [10.1007/s10551-020-04479-4]|
|Appare nelle tipologie:||01.1 - Articolo su rivista (Article)|