According to research, organizational defensive routines (ODRs) have strong and intertwined individual and organizational components. However, the literature has yet to systematically isolate and analyse ODR-triggering factors at both levels. In this paper, we shall first refer to organizational routine theory to expound the characteristics of ODRs. Next, it identifies their individual and organization-level triggers. At the individual level factors generating ODRs are general self-efficacy, locus of control, and neuroticism, while those operating at the organizational level are organizational politics, red tape, and organizational structure. Finally, the chapter explores potential damage ODRs could cause to individuals and organizations related to individuals’ job satisfaction, work engagement, organizational ambidexterity, and organizational learning. The theoretical model presented in this paper forms a foundation for a future empirical study and theoretically extends the nomological network of ODRs.
Triggers and Damages of Organizational Defensive Routines / Yang, Yumei; Secchi, Davide; Homberg, Fabian Kurt Falk. - In: PROBLEMY ZARZĄDZANIA. - ISSN 1644-9584. - 16:6(2018), pp. 85-103. [10.7172/1644-9584.80.6]
Triggers and Damages of Organizational Defensive Routines
Fabian Homberg
2018
Abstract
According to research, organizational defensive routines (ODRs) have strong and intertwined individual and organizational components. However, the literature has yet to systematically isolate and analyse ODR-triggering factors at both levels. In this paper, we shall first refer to organizational routine theory to expound the characteristics of ODRs. Next, it identifies their individual and organization-level triggers. At the individual level factors generating ODRs are general self-efficacy, locus of control, and neuroticism, while those operating at the organizational level are organizational politics, red tape, and organizational structure. Finally, the chapter explores potential damage ODRs could cause to individuals and organizations related to individuals’ job satisfaction, work engagement, organizational ambidexterity, and organizational learning. The theoretical model presented in this paper forms a foundation for a future empirical study and theoretically extends the nomological network of ODRs.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Yang et al. 2018 - MI - Triggers and Damages.pdf
Open Access
Descrizione: published version
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
222.96 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
222.96 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.