There are few ‘mythical’ judgments that every student of European integration has read or ought to have read. Dassonville is one of these judgments. The Court here makes one of its ‘most famous pronouncement[s] ever’; and yet very little historical research on where the Dassonville formula came from and what it was intended to mean in 1974 has yet been undertaken. The conventional wisdom holds that the Court offered a hyper‐liberalist definition of the European internal market, which radically dissociated itself from the conceptual shackles accepted in modern international trade law. According to this view, Dassonville represents the substantive law equivalent of Van Gend en Loos. This traditional view, it will be argued, is simply not borne out by the historical facts. A contextual interpretation indeed shows a very different meaning of Dassonville; and a closer author‐centric analysis reveals a very different understanding of the Dassonville formula in its historical context.

‘Re-reading’Dassonville: Meaning and understanding in the history of European law / Schuetze, Robert. - In: EUROPEAN LAW JOURNAL. - ISSN 1351-5993. - 24:6(2018), pp. 376-407. [10.1111/eulj.12290]

‘Re-reading’Dassonville: Meaning and understanding in the history of European law

Schuetze
2018

Abstract

There are few ‘mythical’ judgments that every student of European integration has read or ought to have read. Dassonville is one of these judgments. The Court here makes one of its ‘most famous pronouncement[s] ever’; and yet very little historical research on where the Dassonville formula came from and what it was intended to mean in 1974 has yet been undertaken. The conventional wisdom holds that the Court offered a hyper‐liberalist definition of the European internal market, which radically dissociated itself from the conceptual shackles accepted in modern international trade law. According to this view, Dassonville represents the substantive law equivalent of Van Gend en Loos. This traditional view, it will be argued, is simply not borne out by the historical facts. A contextual interpretation indeed shows a very different meaning of Dassonville; and a closer author‐centric analysis reveals a very different understanding of the Dassonville formula in its historical context.
‘Re-reading’Dassonville: Meaning and understanding in the history of European law / Schuetze, Robert. - In: EUROPEAN LAW JOURNAL. - ISSN 1351-5993. - 24:6(2018), pp. 376-407. [10.1111/eulj.12290]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Dassonville ELJ.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 789.88 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
789.88 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/193086
Citazioni
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact