This article aims to analyse liability issues as a further means to regulate risks, in case the precautionary measures of the delivered safety system fail. Through liability, the risk that cannot be prevented can be transferred onto those parties who are in the best position to spread them. The allocation of liability thus works as an incentive to the correct functioning of the preventive measures. Liability rules appear to be a key legal remedy which can ensure both tort reparation and a fair and efficient distribution of burdens in a legal order. In this vein, air traffic management (ATM) is addressed as a case study, which shows the main issues and the gaps that liability rules face when dealing with the trade off between risk and safety as conveyed by technology. After having clarified the nature of the relations between risk and liability on the one hand, and automation and liability on the other hand, this article analyses liability issues in the framework of ATM by approaching this topic in a comparative way between the National Airspace System (NAS) of the United States of America (USA) and the Single European Sky (SES) of the European Union (EU).

Against the failures of risk regulation. Liability and safety in air traffic management (ATM) / Simoncini, M; Contissa, G. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RISK REGULATION. - ISSN 1867-299X. - 4:2(2013), pp. 175-189. [10.1017/S1867299X00003330]

Against the failures of risk regulation. Liability and safety in air traffic management (ATM)

SIMONCINI M
;
2013

Abstract

This article aims to analyse liability issues as a further means to regulate risks, in case the precautionary measures of the delivered safety system fail. Through liability, the risk that cannot be prevented can be transferred onto those parties who are in the best position to spread them. The allocation of liability thus works as an incentive to the correct functioning of the preventive measures. Liability rules appear to be a key legal remedy which can ensure both tort reparation and a fair and efficient distribution of burdens in a legal order. In this vein, air traffic management (ATM) is addressed as a case study, which shows the main issues and the gaps that liability rules face when dealing with the trade off between risk and safety as conveyed by technology. After having clarified the nature of the relations between risk and liability on the one hand, and automation and liability on the other hand, this article analyses liability issues in the framework of ATM by approaching this topic in a comparative way between the National Airspace System (NAS) of the United States of America (USA) and the Single European Sky (SES) of the European Union (EU).
Against the failures of risk regulation. Liability and safety in air traffic management (ATM) / Simoncini, M; Contissa, G. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RISK REGULATION. - ISSN 1867-299X. - 4:2(2013), pp. 175-189. [10.1017/S1867299X00003330]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Simoncini_Contissa_Against the failures of risk regulation_final.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 234.53 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
234.53 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Simoncini_Contissa_Against the failures_2013.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 357.43 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
357.43 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11385/190616
Citazioni
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact