Consumers evaluate the convenience of changing their products according to the price paid as well as the technology (quality) level. When the consumers wish to capitalize the products residual value, they should return them as early as possible. Accordingly, we develop a model of Closed-loop Supply Chain (CLSC) where consumers seek to gain as much as possible from their returns and the return rate is a function of both price and quality. We model a two-period Stackelberg game to capture the dynamic aspects of a CLSC, where the manufacturer is the channel leader. We investigate who, namely, manufacturer or retailer, should collect the products in the market. Thus, we identify the best CLSC structure to adopt when the return rate is both price- and quality-dependent. Our results demonstrate that it is always worthwhile for companies to collect products and adopt an active return approach for returns. We investigate the effect of retail competition in both forward and backward channels and show the impact of eliminating the double marginalization on market outcomes.

Trade-in and save: a two-period closed-loop supply chain game with price and technology dependent returns / Genc, Ts; De Giovanni, P. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS. - ISSN 0925-5273. - 183:(2017), pp. 514-527. [10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.012]

Trade-in and save: a two-period closed-loop supply chain game with price and technology dependent returns

De Giovanni P
2017

Abstract

Consumers evaluate the convenience of changing their products according to the price paid as well as the technology (quality) level. When the consumers wish to capitalize the products residual value, they should return them as early as possible. Accordingly, we develop a model of Closed-loop Supply Chain (CLSC) where consumers seek to gain as much as possible from their returns and the return rate is a function of both price and quality. We model a two-period Stackelberg game to capture the dynamic aspects of a CLSC, where the manufacturer is the channel leader. We investigate who, namely, manufacturer or retailer, should collect the products in the market. Thus, we identify the best CLSC structure to adopt when the return rate is both price- and quality-dependent. Our results demonstrate that it is always worthwhile for companies to collect products and adopt an active return approach for returns. We investigate the effect of retail competition in both forward and backward channels and show the impact of eliminating the double marginalization on market outcomes.
Closed-loop supply chain, Technology returns, Incentives
Trade-in and save: a two-period closed-loop supply chain game with price and technology dependent returns / Genc, Ts; De Giovanni, P. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS. - ISSN 0925-5273. - 183:(2017), pp. 514-527. [10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.012]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2 Trade in and save A two period closed loop supply chain game with price and technology dependent returns.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 939.94 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
939.94 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
De Giovanni_Trade-in and save_2017.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 805.09 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
805.09 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11385/190276
Citazioni
  • Scopus 76
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 71
social impact