We explore how a standardization effort (i.e., when a firm pursues standards to further innovation) involves different search processes for knowledge and innovation outcomes. Using an inductive case study of Vanke, a leading Chinese property developer, we show how varying degrees of knowledge complexity and codification combine to produce a typology of four types of search process: active, integrative, decentralized and passive, resulting in four types of innovation outcome: modular, radical, incremental and architectural. We argue that when the standardization effort in a firm involves highly codified knowledge, incremental and architectural innovation outcomes are fostered, while modular and radical innovations are hindered. We discuss how standardization efforts can result in a second-order innovation capability, and conclude by calling for comparative research in other settings to understand how standardization efforts can be suited to different types of search process in different industry contexts.

Standardization efforts: The relationship between knowledge dimensions, search processes and innovation outcomes / Xie, Z.; Hall, J.; Mccarthy, I. P.; Skitmore, M.; Shen, L.. - In: TECHNOVATION. - ISSN 0166-4972. - 48-49:February-March(2016), pp. 69-78. [10.1016/j.technovation.2015.12.002]

Standardization efforts: The relationship between knowledge dimensions, search processes and innovation outcomes

McCarthy I. P.;
2016

Abstract

We explore how a standardization effort (i.e., when a firm pursues standards to further innovation) involves different search processes for knowledge and innovation outcomes. Using an inductive case study of Vanke, a leading Chinese property developer, we show how varying degrees of knowledge complexity and codification combine to produce a typology of four types of search process: active, integrative, decentralized and passive, resulting in four types of innovation outcome: modular, radical, incremental and architectural. We argue that when the standardization effort in a firm involves highly codified knowledge, incremental and architectural innovation outcomes are fostered, while modular and radical innovations are hindered. We discuss how standardization efforts can result in a second-order innovation capability, and conclude by calling for comparative research in other settings to understand how standardization efforts can be suited to different types of search process in different industry contexts.
Construction industry; Innovation; Knowledge; Search process; Standardization effort
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Dina.pdf

Open Access

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 599.64 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
599.64 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11385/188510
Citazioni
  • Scopus 47
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 37
social impact