We explore how a standardization effort (i.e., when a firm pursues standards to further innovation) involves different search processes for knowledge and innovation outcomes. Using an inductive case study of Vanke, a leading Chinese property developer, we show how varying degrees of knowledge complexity and codification combine to produce a typology of four types of search process: active, integrative, decentralized and passive, resulting in four types of innovation outcome: modular, radical, incremental and architectural. We argue that when the standardization effort in a firm involves highly codified knowledge, incremental and architectural innovation outcomes are fostered, while modular and radical innovations are hindered. We discuss how standardization efforts can result in a second-order innovation capability, and conclude by calling for comparative research in other settings to understand how standardization efforts can be suited to different types of search process in different industry contexts.
Standardization efforts: The relationship between knowledge dimensions, search processes and innovation outcomes / Xie, Z.; Hall, J.; Mccarthy, Ian Paul; Skitmore, M.; Shen, L.. - In: TECHNOVATION. - ISSN 0166-4972. - 48-49:February-March(2016), pp. 69-78. [10.1016/j.technovation.2015.12.002]
Standardization efforts: The relationship between knowledge dimensions, search processes and innovation outcomes
McCarthy I. P.;
2016
Abstract
We explore how a standardization effort (i.e., when a firm pursues standards to further innovation) involves different search processes for knowledge and innovation outcomes. Using an inductive case study of Vanke, a leading Chinese property developer, we show how varying degrees of knowledge complexity and codification combine to produce a typology of four types of search process: active, integrative, decentralized and passive, resulting in four types of innovation outcome: modular, radical, incremental and architectural. We argue that when the standardization effort in a firm involves highly codified knowledge, incremental and architectural innovation outcomes are fostered, while modular and radical innovations are hindered. We discuss how standardization efforts can result in a second-order innovation capability, and conclude by calling for comparative research in other settings to understand how standardization efforts can be suited to different types of search process in different industry contexts.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Dina.pdf
Open Access
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
599.64 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
599.64 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.