This paper provides an overview of the main perspectives and themes emerging in research on open innovation (OI). The paper is the result of a collaborative process among several OI scholars–having a common basis in the recurrent Professional Development Workshop on ‘Researching Open Innovation’ at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management. In this paper, we present opportunities for future research on OI, organised at different levels of analysis. We discuss some of the contingencies at these different levels, and argue that future research needs to study OI–originally an organisational-level phenomenon–across multiple levels of analysis. While our integrative framework allows comparing, contrasting and integrating various perspectives at different levels of analysis, further theorising will be needed to advance OI research. On this basis, we propose some new research categories as well as questions for future research–particularly those that span across research domains that have so far developed in isolation.

The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis / Bogers, M.; Zobel, A. -K.; Afuah, A.; Almirall, E.; Brunswicker, S.; Dahlander, L.; Frederiksen, L.; Gawer, A.; Gruber, M.; Haefliger, S.; Hagedoorn, J.; Hilgers, D.; Laursen, K.; Magnusson, MATS GOTTFRID; Majchrzak, A.; Mccarthy, Ian Paul; Moeslein, K. M.; Nambisan, S.; Piller, F. T.; Radziwon, A.; Rossi-Lamastra, C.; Sims, J.; Ter Wal, A. L. J.. - In: INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION. - ISSN 1366-2716. - 24:1(2017), pp. 8-40. [10.1080/13662716.2016.1240068]

The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis

Magnusson M. G.;McCarthy I. P.;
2017

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the main perspectives and themes emerging in research on open innovation (OI). The paper is the result of a collaborative process among several OI scholars–having a common basis in the recurrent Professional Development Workshop on ‘Researching Open Innovation’ at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management. In this paper, we present opportunities for future research on OI, organised at different levels of analysis. We discuss some of the contingencies at these different levels, and argue that future research needs to study OI–originally an organisational-level phenomenon–across multiple levels of analysis. While our integrative framework allows comparing, contrasting and integrating various perspectives at different levels of analysis, further theorising will be needed to advance OI research. On this basis, we propose some new research categories as well as questions for future research–particularly those that span across research domains that have so far developed in isolation.
2017
business model; collaboration; contingencies; crowdsourcing; ecosystems; entrepreneurship; governance; knowledge; Open innovation; organisation; platforms; research; review; strategy; theory
The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis / Bogers, M.; Zobel, A. -K.; Afuah, A.; Almirall, E.; Brunswicker, S.; Dahlander, L.; Frederiksen, L.; Gawer, A.; Gruber, M.; Haefliger, S.; Hagedoorn, J.; Hilgers, D.; Laursen, K.; Magnusson, MATS GOTTFRID; Majchrzak, A.; Mccarthy, Ian Paul; Moeslein, K. M.; Nambisan, S.; Piller, F. T.; Radziwon, A.; Rossi-Lamastra, C.; Sims, J.; Ter Wal, A. L. J.. - In: INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION. - ISSN 1366-2716. - 24:1(2017), pp. 8-40. [10.1080/13662716.2016.1240068]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
landscape.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: DRM (Digital rights management) non definiti
Dimensione 2.17 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.17 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/188492
Citazioni
  • Scopus 651
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 536
social impact