The fact that the news has a negativity bias is relatively undisputed. But is this a matter for concern? In this study, two experiments explored the impact of different types of constructive news stories on readers’ affect, motivation, and behavioural intentions. Study 1 examined news stories with either a solution frame or catastrophic frame, and Study 2 examined stories that evoked either positive or negative emotions. Findings revealed that catastrophically-framed stories and news stories that evoked negative emotions reduced intentions to take positive action to address issues, and resulted in negative affect. In contrast, solution-framed stories and news stories that evoked positive emotions resulted in more positive affect and higher intentions to take positive action and were still perceived as legitimate journalism. Respondents expressed a greater preference for solution-framed news. The conclusion is that more constructive journalism would better serve society.
|Titolo:||The Impact of Constructive News on Affective and Behavioural Responses|
|Data di pubblicazione:||2019|
|Appare nelle tipologie:||01.1 - Articolo su rivista (Article)|
File in questo prodotto:
|Baden MCIntyre & Homberg 2018_The Impact of Constructive News on Affective and Behavioural Responses.pdf||online first version of manuscript||Versione dell'editore||DRM non definito||Administrator|
|Baden MCIntyre & Homberg 2018_The Impact of Constructive News on Affective and Behavioural Responses_published version.pdf||published version||Versione dell'editore||NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto||Administrator|