The literature on party system change and electoral volatility in post-communist Europe tends to make a clear-cut distinction between Central and Eastern European (CEE) party systems and Western European (WE) ones. The former are unstable and unpredictable and electoral volatility is driven by the continuous emergence of new political parties. Conversely, electoral stability is the rule in the latter, and volatility is associated with electoral shifts among established parties. This conventional wisdom suffers from three potential sources of bias: case selection, time coverage and method. By correcting these biases, this article investigates whether the traditional division between CEE and WE party systems has been levelled as regards volatility. To do so, it presents evidence based on an original data set of electoral volatility and its internal components covering 31 WE and CEE party systems since 1990. It finds that a process of asymmetric convergence in the levels of electoral volatility is taking place between the two regions, with Western Europe approaching Central and Eastern Europe with increasing electoral instability.

Does the Iron Curtain Still Exist? the Convergence in Electoral Volatility between Eastern and Western Europe / Emanuele, Vincenzo; Chiaramonte, Alessandro; Soare, Sorina. - In: GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION. - ISSN 0017-257X. - 55:2(2020), pp. 308-326. [10.1017/gov.2018.25]

Does the Iron Curtain Still Exist? the Convergence in Electoral Volatility between Eastern and Western Europe

Emanuele, Vincenzo;
2020

Abstract

The literature on party system change and electoral volatility in post-communist Europe tends to make a clear-cut distinction between Central and Eastern European (CEE) party systems and Western European (WE) ones. The former are unstable and unpredictable and electoral volatility is driven by the continuous emergence of new political parties. Conversely, electoral stability is the rule in the latter, and volatility is associated with electoral shifts among established parties. This conventional wisdom suffers from three potential sources of bias: case selection, time coverage and method. By correcting these biases, this article investigates whether the traditional division between CEE and WE party systems has been levelled as regards volatility. To do so, it presents evidence based on an original data set of electoral volatility and its internal components covering 31 WE and CEE party systems since 1990. It finds that a process of asymmetric convergence in the levels of electoral volatility is taking place between the two regions, with Western Europe approaching Central and Eastern Europe with increasing electoral instability.
Central and Eastern Europe; convergence; electoral volatility; party systems; Western Europe; Sociology and Political Science; Public Administration
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Emanuele, Chiaramonte and Soare 2020.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 350.11 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
350.11 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11385/181635
Citazioni
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact