Technology licensing agreements potentially can create future appropriabilityproblems. Drawing on the appropriability literature, we argue that the inclusion of a grantback clause in technology licensing agreements is an attempt to balance the gains from and protection of the focal firms’ technologies. We hypothesize that the closer the licensed technology is to the licensor’s core patented technologies, the more likely the licensing agreement will include a grant-back clause, while the closer the licensed technology is to the licensee’s core patent portfolio, the less likely the agreement will include a grant-back clause. We hypothesize also that technological uncertainty is a positive moderator in the decision to include a grant-back clause, if the licensed technology is close to either the licensee’s or the licensor’s core technologies. We employ a hierarchical nested decision model to test the hypotheses on a sample of 397 licensed technologies. This method allows us to model the choice to include a grant-back clause as nested in the decision about which technologies to license out. We find broad support for our theoretical arguments.

Evading the Boomerang Effect: Using the Grant-Back Clause to Further Generative Appropriability from Technology Licensing Deals / Laursen, Keld; Moreira, Solon; Reichstein, Toke; Leone, MARIA ISABELLA. - In: ORGANIZATION SCIENCE. - ISSN 1047-7039. - 28:3(2017), pp. 514-530. [10.1287/orsc.2017.1130]

Evading the Boomerang Effect: Using the Grant-Back Clause to Further Generative Appropriability from Technology Licensing Deals

LEONE, MARIA ISABELLA
2017

Abstract

Technology licensing agreements potentially can create future appropriabilityproblems. Drawing on the appropriability literature, we argue that the inclusion of a grantback clause in technology licensing agreements is an attempt to balance the gains from and protection of the focal firms’ technologies. We hypothesize that the closer the licensed technology is to the licensor’s core patented technologies, the more likely the licensing agreement will include a grant-back clause, while the closer the licensed technology is to the licensee’s core patent portfolio, the less likely the agreement will include a grant-back clause. We hypothesize also that technological uncertainty is a positive moderator in the decision to include a grant-back clause, if the licensed technology is close to either the licensee’s or the licensor’s core technologies. We employ a hierarchical nested decision model to test the hypotheses on a sample of 397 licensed technologies. This method allows us to model the choice to include a grant-back clause as nested in the decision about which technologies to license out. We find broad support for our theoretical arguments.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
orsc.2017.1130.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Evading The Boomerang Effect
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 553.8 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
553.8 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
orsc.2017.1130.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 376.18 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
376.18 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11385/173969
Citazioni
  • Scopus 24
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
social impact