In ch. 2 of In a Better World, E. Baccarini claims that certain genetic interventions (additive enhancements and treatments) are permissible, whereas suppressive enhancements are impermissible. He connects these claims to an ideal of fair equality of opportunity, understood as a public reason. In this note, I make two points. First, an ideal of fair equality of opportunity in a post-genomic society commits us to the view that certain genetic interventions are prima facie required, not simply permissible. Second, a nondiscriminatory or affirmational view of disability makes some suppressive enhancements permissible, at least if reproductive freedom is assumed.
Better Humans or A Better World? On Baccarini's View of Permissible Enhancements / Pellegrino, Gianfranco. - In: ETICA & POLITICA. - ISSN 1825-5167. - XVIII:3(2016), pp. 467-484.
Better Humans or A Better World? On Baccarini's View of Permissible Enhancements
PELLEGRINO, GIANFRANCO
2016
Abstract
In ch. 2 of In a Better World, E. Baccarini claims that certain genetic interventions (additive enhancements and treatments) are permissible, whereas suppressive enhancements are impermissible. He connects these claims to an ideal of fair equality of opportunity, understood as a public reason. In this note, I make two points. First, an ideal of fair equality of opportunity in a post-genomic society commits us to the view that certain genetic interventions are prima facie required, not simply permissible. Second, a nondiscriminatory or affirmational view of disability makes some suppressive enhancements permissible, at least if reproductive freedom is assumed.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
PELLEGRINO.pdf
Open Access
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
DRM (Digital rights management) non definiti
Dimensione
164.76 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
164.76 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.