The essay advocates in favour of qualifying the nature of the pending constitutional amendment to the Italian Constitution as a (text for a) "constitutional law" instead of a "constitutional revision law" on the basis of the rules concerning the formulation of the question to appear on the ballot for the constitutional referendum. With the occasion of replying to a previous essay by Paolo Carnevale, who proposed the opposite interpretation, the essay recalls the way of approving titles of ordinary and constitutional law and their role in unambiguously identifying the act.
Il referendum costituzionale e il suo quesito: proseguendo un dialogo con Paolo Carnevale / Piccirilli, Giovanni. - In: OSSERVATORIO SULLE FONTI. - ISSN 2038-5633. - 2(2016), pp. 1-21.
Il referendum costituzionale e il suo quesito: proseguendo un dialogo con Paolo Carnevale
PICCIRILLI, GIOVANNI
2016
Abstract
The essay advocates in favour of qualifying the nature of the pending constitutional amendment to the Italian Constitution as a (text for a) "constitutional law" instead of a "constitutional revision law" on the basis of the rules concerning the formulation of the question to appear on the ballot for the constitutional referendum. With the occasion of replying to a previous essay by Paolo Carnevale, who proposed the opposite interpretation, the essay recalls the way of approving titles of ordinary and constitutional law and their role in unambiguously identifying the act.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Piccirilli - referendum costituzionale e titolo della l cost (dialogo con Carnevale).pdf
Open Access
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
DRM (Digital rights management) non definiti
Dimensione
258.29 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
258.29 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.