In federal states, constitutional identity is the glue that holds together the Union. On the contrary, in the European Union – not a fully-fledged federation yet – each Member state has its own constitutional identity. On the one hand, the Union may benefit from the particular knowledge, innovation, history, diversity and culture of its individual states. On the other hand, identity-related claims may have a disintegrating effect. Constitutional diversity needs to come to terms with risks of disintegration. The Treaty on the European Union seeks a balance, providing the obligation to respect the constitutional identities of its Member states. Drawing from the European experience, this article compares judicial and non-judicial means of accommodation of divergent constitutional values. In the category of non-judicial means, political negotiated exemptions and opt-outs in favor of certain Member states have been considered. In the category of judicial means of accommodation, this article analyzes how national and supranational Courts approach the concept of constitutional identity. This article finds that nonjudicial means of accommodation of identity-related conflicts are a crucial complement to judicial ones and – under certain circumstances – a superior alternative.

A Living Constitutional Identity: The Contribution of Non-judicial Actors / Faraguna, Pietro. - 10:(2015).

A Living Constitutional Identity: The Contribution of Non-judicial Actors

FARAGUNA, PIETRO
2015

Abstract

In federal states, constitutional identity is the glue that holds together the Union. On the contrary, in the European Union – not a fully-fledged federation yet – each Member state has its own constitutional identity. On the one hand, the Union may benefit from the particular knowledge, innovation, history, diversity and culture of its individual states. On the other hand, identity-related claims may have a disintegrating effect. Constitutional diversity needs to come to terms with risks of disintegration. The Treaty on the European Union seeks a balance, providing the obligation to respect the constitutional identities of its Member states. Drawing from the European experience, this article compares judicial and non-judicial means of accommodation of divergent constitutional values. In the category of non-judicial means, political negotiated exemptions and opt-outs in favor of certain Member states have been considered. In the category of judicial means of accommodation, this article analyzes how national and supranational Courts approach the concept of constitutional identity. This article finds that nonjudicial means of accommodation of identity-related conflicts are a crucial complement to judicial ones and – under certain circumstances – a superior alternative.
constitutional identity, European Union, Constitution, Differentiated integration, Counter-Limits, Solange
A Living Constitutional Identity: The Contribution of Non-judicial Actors / Faraguna, Pietro. - 10:(2015).
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2015_11_JMWP 10 Faraguna ISSN.pdf

Open Access

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.85 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.85 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/165934
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact