By judgement no. 238/2014, the Italian Constitutional Court recognized the right of Italian victims of international crimes committed by German troops during the Second World War to claim compensation against Germany before Italian courts. In the opinion of the Constitutional Court, the customary rule on State immunities, as ascertained by the ICJ 2012 judgement on Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy), cannot be applied in the domestic legal order insofar as it is contrary to constitutional fundamental values such as the right to a judge, and the inalienable rights of the human being. By applying the doctrine of ‘counter-limits’ and carrying out a ‘balance of interests’, the Italian Constitutional Court declares that the protection of the core values of the domestic legal order have pre-eminence over the respect for foreign State sovereignty whenever, as it is the case, the recognition of immunity has the effect to deprive individual victims of international crimes of any kind of judicial redress. Because of the Italian Constitutional Court judgement, the full reparation envisaged by the ICJ decision is precluded. It is up to the Italian government to identify alternative forms of compensation in favour of Germany and it is for the Italian judges to decide on the admissibility of individual claims against Germany, taking into account the circumstances of every single case.

La regola sulla immunità giurisdizionale dello Stato davanti alla Corte costituzionale / Sciso, Elena. - In: DIRITTI UMANI E DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE. - ISSN 1971-7105. - 9:1(2015), pp. 61-83.

La regola sulla immunità giurisdizionale dello Stato davanti alla Corte costituzionale

SCISO, ELENA
2015

Abstract

By judgement no. 238/2014, the Italian Constitutional Court recognized the right of Italian victims of international crimes committed by German troops during the Second World War to claim compensation against Germany before Italian courts. In the opinion of the Constitutional Court, the customary rule on State immunities, as ascertained by the ICJ 2012 judgement on Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy), cannot be applied in the domestic legal order insofar as it is contrary to constitutional fundamental values such as the right to a judge, and the inalienable rights of the human being. By applying the doctrine of ‘counter-limits’ and carrying out a ‘balance of interests’, the Italian Constitutional Court declares that the protection of the core values of the domestic legal order have pre-eminence over the respect for foreign State sovereignty whenever, as it is the case, the recognition of immunity has the effect to deprive individual victims of international crimes of any kind of judicial redress. Because of the Italian Constitutional Court judgement, the full reparation envisaged by the ICJ decision is precluded. It is up to the Italian government to identify alternative forms of compensation in favour of Germany and it is for the Italian judges to decide on the admissibility of individual claims against Germany, taking into account the circumstances of every single case.
2015
Corte costituzionale Regola consuetudinaria sull'immunità degli Stati Diritti fondamentali e diritto al giudice Primato dei valori supremi della Costituzione
La regola sulla immunità giurisdizionale dello Stato davanti alla Corte costituzionale / Sciso, Elena. - In: DIRITTI UMANI E DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE. - ISSN 1971-7105. - 9:1(2015), pp. 61-83.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
07_Il_caso(1)_Sciso.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: DRM (Digital rights management) non definiti
Dimensione 175.74 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
175.74 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/155536
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact