Manuscript Type: Empirical Research Question/Issue: Given the global diffusion and the relevance of codes of good governance, the aim of this article is to investigate if the main reason behind their proliferation in civil law countries is: (i) the determination to improve the efficiency of the national governance system; or (ii) the will to “legitimize” domestic companies in the global financial market without radically improving the governance practices. Research Findings/Insights: We collected corporate governance codes developed worldwide at the end of 2005, and classified them according to the country’s legal system (common or civil law). Then, we made a comparative analysis of the scope, coverage, and strictness of recommendations of the codes. We tested differences between common law and civil law countries using t-tests and probit models. Our findings suggest that the issuance of codes in civil law countries be prompted more by legitimation reasons than by the determination to improve the governance practices of national companies. Theoretical/Academic Implications: The study contributes to enriching our knowledge on the process of reinvention characterizing the diffusion of new practices. Our results are consistent with a symbolic perspective on corporate governance, and support the view that diffusing practices are usually modified or “reinvented” by adopters. Practitioner/Policy Implications: Our results support the idea that the characteristics of the national corporate governance system and law explain the main differences among the coverage of codes. This conclusion indicates the existence of a strong interplay between hard and soft law.

Why Adopt Codes of Good Governance? A Comparison of Institutional and Efficiency Perspectives / Zattoni, Alessandro; F., Cuomo. - In: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE. - ISSN 0964-8410. - 16:1(2008), pp. 1-15. [10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00661.x]

Why Adopt Codes of Good Governance? A Comparison of Institutional and Efficiency Perspectives

ZATTONI, ALESSANDRO;
2008

Abstract

Manuscript Type: Empirical Research Question/Issue: Given the global diffusion and the relevance of codes of good governance, the aim of this article is to investigate if the main reason behind their proliferation in civil law countries is: (i) the determination to improve the efficiency of the national governance system; or (ii) the will to “legitimize” domestic companies in the global financial market without radically improving the governance practices. Research Findings/Insights: We collected corporate governance codes developed worldwide at the end of 2005, and classified them according to the country’s legal system (common or civil law). Then, we made a comparative analysis of the scope, coverage, and strictness of recommendations of the codes. We tested differences between common law and civil law countries using t-tests and probit models. Our findings suggest that the issuance of codes in civil law countries be prompted more by legitimation reasons than by the determination to improve the governance practices of national companies. Theoretical/Academic Implications: The study contributes to enriching our knowledge on the process of reinvention characterizing the diffusion of new practices. Our results are consistent with a symbolic perspective on corporate governance, and support the view that diffusing practices are usually modified or “reinvented” by adopters. Practitioner/Policy Implications: Our results support the idea that the characteristics of the national corporate governance system and law explain the main differences among the coverage of codes. This conclusion indicates the existence of a strong interplay between hard and soft law.
2008
Why Adopt Codes of Good Governance? A Comparison of Institutional and Efficiency Perspectives / Zattoni, Alessandro; F., Cuomo. - In: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE. - ISSN 0964-8410. - 16:1(2008), pp. 1-15. [10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00661.x]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Why adopt codes of good governance_final.pdf

Open Access

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: DRM (Digital rights management) non definiti
Dimensione 165.69 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
165.69 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/144604
Citazioni
  • Scopus 253
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 205
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact