The origins and developments of law and economics (hereinafter L&E) in Italy can be described as an uneasy but successful enterprise with some shadows, most of which regarding the future. The most telling proxy of the inroad of L&E is probably represented by judicial imprinting. Ranging from Constitutional Court to judges of peace, there is plenty of judgements whose holdings are based on the achievements, or at least appear to be sensitive to the hints of the economic analysis of law, though with different «weights» and degrees of «recognition». On the whole, however, the Italian judiciary not only did not refute the hurdle, but possibly tried to abide by the directives stemming from L&E work. In a sense, on this count, L&E has undoubtedly entered into the legal discourse (or, concededly, the legal parlance). A relevant part of the Italian trajectory has been drawn in what might be called the first scenario of L&E, where it carries out an exploratory activity, in a scientific environment which rejects the need to use any technicalities in economics. The second scenario is characterized by the surge of the economists, who bring along sophisticated analytical tools and hardly conceal a degree of intolerance towards «unstructured», informal rationales. This paves the way towards a process of divergence, which would be at odds with the original interdisciplinary inspiration of L&E, while shutting the door to further developments. If, then, a third scenario is to come, the goal to be pursued should be all too obvious: positing economic analysis as a legal source, relevant to the making of the law and to its actual enforcement. This goal cannot be accomplished against (or despite) the jurists.
Analisi economica del diritto: "The Italian Job" / Pardolesi, Roberto; Francesca, Caroccia. - In: IL FORO ITALIANO. - ISSN 0015-783X. - CXXXIX:9(2014), pp. 193-214.
Analisi economica del diritto: "The Italian Job"
PARDOLESI, ROBERTO;
2014
Abstract
The origins and developments of law and economics (hereinafter L&E) in Italy can be described as an uneasy but successful enterprise with some shadows, most of which regarding the future. The most telling proxy of the inroad of L&E is probably represented by judicial imprinting. Ranging from Constitutional Court to judges of peace, there is plenty of judgements whose holdings are based on the achievements, or at least appear to be sensitive to the hints of the economic analysis of law, though with different «weights» and degrees of «recognition». On the whole, however, the Italian judiciary not only did not refute the hurdle, but possibly tried to abide by the directives stemming from L&E work. In a sense, on this count, L&E has undoubtedly entered into the legal discourse (or, concededly, the legal parlance). A relevant part of the Italian trajectory has been drawn in what might be called the first scenario of L&E, where it carries out an exploratory activity, in a scientific environment which rejects the need to use any technicalities in economics. The second scenario is characterized by the surge of the economists, who bring along sophisticated analytical tools and hardly conceal a degree of intolerance towards «unstructured», informal rationales. This paves the way towards a process of divergence, which would be at odds with the original interdisciplinary inspiration of L&E, while shutting the door to further developments. If, then, a third scenario is to come, the goal to be pursued should be all too obvious: positing economic analysis as a legal source, relevant to the making of the law and to its actual enforcement. This goal cannot be accomplished against (or despite) the jurists.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Italian_Job.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
166.7 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
166.7 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.