The text derives from the hearing held by the Senate's Committee for Constitutional Affairs, on 14th November 2019, during the exam of a constitutional amendment, already approved by the Chamber of deputies, aimed at lowering the age threshold to vote for the Senate, from 25 to 18 years old. It convincingly supports the constitutional amendment, necessary indeed since a long time, even more so after the confirmation of symmetrical bicameralism derived from the constitutional referendum of 4th December 2016 that rejected a more comprehensive constitutional reform. It then analyses advances and disadvantages of the method of single-issue constitutional reforms, followed during the current legislative term, and argues to use caution in adding further objects to this amendment: the only addition could be aimed at lowering - from 40 to 25 years old - also the right to stand as a candidate for the Senate

1. La parificazione dell’elettorato attivo tra Camera e Senato: un emendamento costituzionale da tempo necessario. – 2. Un emendamento ora indifferibile, alla luce della conferma del bicameralismo paritario. – 3. Il metodo delle riforme costituzionali “single-issue”: origini, vantaggi e svantaggi. – 4. Quali aggiunte? In caso, solo la parificazione (anche) dell’elettorato passivo.

Il “mezzo voto” ai cittadini più giovani: un’anomalia da superare quanto prima / Lupo, Nicola. - In: OSSERVATORIO COSTITUZIONALE. - ISSN 2283-7515. - 6(2019), pp. 1-11.

Il “mezzo voto” ai cittadini più giovani: un’anomalia da superare quanto prima

Nicola Lupo
2019

Abstract

The text derives from the hearing held by the Senate's Committee for Constitutional Affairs, on 14th November 2019, during the exam of a constitutional amendment, already approved by the Chamber of deputies, aimed at lowering the age threshold to vote for the Senate, from 25 to 18 years old. It convincingly supports the constitutional amendment, necessary indeed since a long time, even more so after the confirmation of symmetrical bicameralism derived from the constitutional referendum of 4th December 2016 that rejected a more comprehensive constitutional reform. It then analyses advances and disadvantages of the method of single-issue constitutional reforms, followed during the current legislative term, and argues to use caution in adding further objects to this amendment: the only addition could be aimed at lowering - from 40 to 25 years old - also the right to stand as a candidate for the Senate
2019
1. La parificazione dell’elettorato attivo tra Camera e Senato: un emendamento costituzionale da tempo necessario. – 2. Un emendamento ora indifferibile, alla luce della conferma del bicameralismo paritario. – 3. Il metodo delle riforme costituzionali “single-issue”: origini, vantaggi e svantaggi. – 4. Quali aggiunte? In caso, solo la parificazione (anche) dell’elettorato passivo.
Il “mezzo voto” ai cittadini più giovani: un’anomalia da superare quanto prima / Lupo, Nicola. - In: OSSERVATORIO COSTITUZIONALE. - ISSN 2283-7515. - 6(2019), pp. 1-11.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2019_6_11_Lupo.pdf

Open Access

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: DRM (Digital rights management) non definiti
Dimensione 666.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
666.96 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/190745
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact