Luxury industry and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activates are generally considered as incompatible concepts by consumers. This because luxury is generally related to hedonism, excess, and ostentation, while CSR is generally based on sobriety, moderation and ethics. However, nowadays more and more luxury companies seem highly committed toward sustainability. For example, Tiffany started certifying its diamonds as “conflict free”, Chanel incorporated “earthy materials” in its 2016 collection, and Bulgari has recently funded restoration of Rome's Spanish Steps. Therefore, it seems plausible the presence of a certain compatibility degree between luxury and CSR activities. However, this issue has received very limited empirical investigation from marketing literature. As a consequence, the present research aims to empirically test whether and under what conditions consumers react to different kinds of luxury companies’ CSR initiatives. Using the Carroll’s four dimensions model of internal vs. external CSR, we argue and demonstrated that luxury companies’ internal (versus external) CSR initiatives increase willingness to buy luxury products, but mainly for those customers who buy luxury for internal motivations and not for status ostentation, as for example individual style and personal taste.

Sustainable Luxury: The Effect of Luxury Consumption Motivations on Corporate Social Responsibilities Strategies / Donato, Carmela; Amatulli, Cesare; De Angelis, Matteo. - Proceedings of the 21st Academy of Marketing Science World Marketing Congress, (2018), pp. "-"-"-". (21st Academy of Marketing Science World Marketing Congress (WMC), Universidade Lusiada-Norte, Porto Portugal, Wednesday, June 27, 2018).

Sustainable Luxury: The Effect of Luxury Consumption Motivations on Corporate Social Responsibilities Strategies

Donato, Carmela
Methodology
;
De Angelis, Matteo
Conceptualization
2018

Abstract

Luxury industry and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activates are generally considered as incompatible concepts by consumers. This because luxury is generally related to hedonism, excess, and ostentation, while CSR is generally based on sobriety, moderation and ethics. However, nowadays more and more luxury companies seem highly committed toward sustainability. For example, Tiffany started certifying its diamonds as “conflict free”, Chanel incorporated “earthy materials” in its 2016 collection, and Bulgari has recently funded restoration of Rome's Spanish Steps. Therefore, it seems plausible the presence of a certain compatibility degree between luxury and CSR activities. However, this issue has received very limited empirical investigation from marketing literature. As a consequence, the present research aims to empirically test whether and under what conditions consumers react to different kinds of luxury companies’ CSR initiatives. Using the Carroll’s four dimensions model of internal vs. external CSR, we argue and demonstrated that luxury companies’ internal (versus external) CSR initiatives increase willingness to buy luxury products, but mainly for those customers who buy luxury for internal motivations and not for status ostentation, as for example individual style and personal taste.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Paper_SUSTAINABLE LUXURY THE EFFECT OF LUXURY CONSUMPTION MOTIVATIONS ON CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY STRATEGIES.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: DRM (Digital rights management) non definiti
Dimensione 270.71 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
270.71 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11385/177544
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact